Quotes of All Topics . Occasions . Authors
Men don't oppress women any more than women oppress men.
I think, on the whole, men are much more shallow than women.
Women are more skilled than men at making gossip entertaining.
Relationships between men and women have become much more complicated.
Why are women... so much more interesting to men than men are to women?
Women are obviously much more discriminated against than men in many ways.
Men are just as sensitive, and in some ways more sensitive, than women are.
Men, their rights, and nothing more; women, their rights, and nothing less.
I identify with women more than men. I guess I have a strong feminine side.
If men knew all that women think, they would be twenty times more audacious.
I think that women are much more collaborative; men are much more competitive.
It's no secret that the blogosphere is more vicious on women than it is on men.
Women are more emotional than men, so they must attach emotion to their memories.
I think in general, novels by men tend to be taken more seriously than novels by women.
Women are one of the Almighty's enigmas to prove to men that He knows more than they do.
Men think we can't do two things at once. They can't, but we can. Women are more resilient.
The Catholic men are more upset about women not being able to be priests than are Catholic women.
Get more women producers, writers, directors. Why should we expect men to do it for us? They can't.
Women are often expected to be more amiable or more pleasing or more submissive than men generally.
I'm more androgynous, because men are supposed to be more spatial, women more literal - I'm a tomboy.
Even more than the Pill, what has liberated women is that they no longer need to depend on men economically.
There's no evidence whatsoever that men are more rational than women. Both sexes seem to be equally irrational.
Because women get more labor rights than men, meaning they get maternity leave, the employer prefers to hire men.
I'm a synthesizer. We need to synthesize more the relationships between artists and scientists, and men and women.
There are a lot more roles for men than there are for women. So men get their fee up by sheer quantity of material.
The women are stepping up their degree of difficulty more than the men. A lot of us do the same dives as the men now.
One thing is for sure: that women are far more compassionate, empathetic, sensitive, and emotional in comparison to men.
I think that women are more sensitive to emotional infidelity than men. I think men are more scared of physical infidelity.
Modeling is one of the few professions where women out-earn men, and that's because we're more valuable objects and ornaments.
I think women let themselves be burdened by failures much more than men do. They agonize - and I do it a lot, too - and rethink them.
Women on the whole are often not as shallow as men are. They can be, but they cut through things a little more easily than men do in terms of that superficial stuff.
Of all the nasty outcomes predicted for women's liberation... none was more alarming, from a feminist point of view, than the suggestion that women would eventually become just like men.
Women are far and away the bigger consumers of fiction than men, but men are still far and away the more reviewed, the more critically esteemed, the more respected. That can get frustrating.
Almost without exception, the talented women I have known have believed they had less ability than they actually had. And almost without exception, the talented men I have known believed they had more.
Male critics and men in the publishing industry want from their women writers what they want from their wives. I'm interested in presenting characters that are more challenging, threatening, complicated and unpredictable.
I was driven when I was younger. Driven at West Point where it was much more competitive in that women were competing with men on many levels, and I was driven in the military and at Harvard, both competitive environments.
Usually superheroes with all their powers and action-driven narratives are supposed to appeal to boys and men more than women; and as an extension of that, it is a given that the creators of these characters are primarily men.
Anorexia and bulimia seem to be getting much more common in boys, men, and women of all ages and socioeconomic backgrounds; they are also becoming more common in racial groups previously thought to be impervious to the problem.
Hmm, can I be obvious and say there is probably a double standard for male vs. female directors? Sadly, I think that's actually the case. And it probably stems from the fact that there are proportionately so many fewer women directors than men ones that each project is perhaps more closely scrutinized for its content.