Quotes of All Topics . Occasions . Authors
We know for a fact that there are weapons there.
I still believe to some degree that Iraq had WMD.
Would the Iraq War have occurred without WMD? I doubt it.
If we wait for the danger to become clear, it could be too late.
Within a week, or a month, Saddam could give his WMD to al-Qaeda.
They may have had time to destroy them, and I don't know the answer.
We know where they are. They are in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad.
So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real.
I have no doubt we're going to find big stores of weapons of mass destruction.
He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.
We are against any WMD, any weapons of mass destruction, whether chemical or nuclear.
One of our top objectives is to find and destroy the WMD. There are a number of sites.
Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction.
We never believed that we'd just tumble over weapons of mass destruction in that country.
Saddam's removal is necessary to eradicate the threat from his weapons of mass destruction
I share the administration's goals in dealing with Iraq and its weapons of mass destruction.
Before people crow about the absence of weapons of mass destruction, I suggest they wait a bit.
Iran is actively pursuing the development of weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles.
I am confident that we will find evidence that makes it clear he had weapons of mass destruction.
We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.
If he declares he has none, then we will know that Saddam Hussein is once again misleading the world.
We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.
U.S. officials never expected that 'we were going to open garages and find' weapons of mass destruction.
Nuclear proliferation - the proliferation of WMDs altogether - is one of the greatest dangers of our time.
Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.
I'm saying that the WMD reporting was not consciously evil. It was bad journalism, even very bad journalism.
Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons.
We know that Saddam Hussein is determined to keep his weapons of mass destruction, is determined to make more.
In April 1991, after the Gulf war, Iraq was given 15 days to provide a full and final declaration of all its WMD.
I'm not surprised if we begin to uncover the weapons program of Saddam Hussein - because he had a weapons program.
Sooner or later, jihadist-style terror and WMD are going to come together and the consequences could be horrendous.
The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.
We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction.
The claims made about Iraq's WMD capabilities before the invasion were inaccurate, wrong, and in some cases, deliberately misleading.
Saddam Hussein is not the only deranged dictator who is willing to deprive his people in order to acquire weapons of mass destruction.
I'm absolutely sure that there are weapons of mass destruction there and the evidence will be forthcoming. We're just getting it just now.
Given time, given the number of prisoners now that we're interrogating, I'm confident that we're going to find weapons of mass destruction.
The truth is not being aired in the West. It’s a surreal perversion of history that’s going on once again, as in Bush pre-Iraq ‘WMD’ campaign.
Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent.
The intelligence is clear: (Saddam) continues to believe his WMD programme is essential both for internal repression and for external aggression.
We know where they are [Iraq's weapons of mass destruction]. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat.
I don't think the North Korean leadership is interested in a genuine deal to end their WMD programs or their stranglehold on the North Korean people.
Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.
Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement
Every day Saddam remains in power with chemical weapons, biological weapons, and the development of nuclear weapons is a day of danger for the United States.
The judgements about the severity of the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of a mass destruction - WMD - were presented with a certainty that was not justified.
Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them against his own people.
So has the strategic decision been made to disarm Iraq of its weapons of mass destruction by the leadership in Baghdad? I think our judgment has to be clearly not.
One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line.
If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program.