If you don't take your clothes seriously, why should your viewers take you seriously?

It's great that 'Glee' is making viewers more aware of the arts. People appreciate it.

There's something imminent in the work, but the circle is only completed by the viewer.

The context in which a photograph is seen affects the meaning the viewer draws from it.

Obviously, SNL has a lot of viewers, but the potential for a movie is through the roof.

When we are part of mainstream cinema, we want our movies to be seen by maximum viewers.

Republican presidential debates have become contests of who can terrify viewers the most.

If reality shows are so popular, that means their viewers are screaming for more realness.

I'm not out to max my income. I think my viewers would call me on that right away if I did.

I'm so grateful to have my viewers, and they all have been so supportive through the years.

I'm not chasing reality shows. Viewers want to see me and producers want me on their shows.

Everybody loves good humour and in movies, we are in search of things that make viewers laugh.

So, in other words, how you respond to a sculpture, how a viewer sees the sculpture, is vital.

If I look like a six-pack replete warrior in 'Tanu Weds Manu,' viewers are not going accept me.

My viewers are smart. They know I have a contract with a TV show and that I make a lot of money.

Magic's about understanding - and then manipulating - how viewers digest the sensory information.

Viewers figure, 'Uncle Willard doesn't know any more about the weather than I do.' They're right.

I do not make movies to send any message, but my treatment makes my viewers think on the subject.

One has to have the right spirit, attitude and make a place for themselves in the viewers' hearts.

My paintings don't simply represent what I see; they present viewers with what I want them to see.

With a first season, you never really know how viewers or the network are going to react to a show.

Viewers don't want you to walk the fence - they do want a point of view - and that's what we bring.

We've had a chance to be seen by viewers who had never seen us before, and we've kept a lot of them.

My very first news director said to me that it's better to be hated than to have viewers be neutral.

It's like going back to 'X Factor' but it's even bigger because Eurovision has so many more viewers.

Younger viewers have a very strong detector for what's real and legit and what's phony or pandering.

If we have no respect for our viewers, then how can we have any respect for ourselves and what we do?

The whole purpose of filmmaking is to entertain the viewers and when it happens, it gives you a high.

The minute viewers callin or write about your looks, they were not listening to what you were saying.

I really focus on giving the viewers compelling television, and hope that more and more people watch.

Viewers who invest two hours in a superhero movie often leave feeling entertained but somehow dumber.

The films of Gregg Araki may not be classified as horror, but they have been known to horrify viewers.

I want viewers to see that everything is connected, even the little guys like pollinators and flowers.

My aim is to make the viewer become aware of his or her responsibility in what he or she is looking at.

I think my viewers want smart, honest programming. They don't want to be told what makes them feel good.

For the very first time, viewers will be able to watch their favorite shows before the rest of the world.

The people who love my paintings, that respond to them the most, they're spectators, they're not viewers.

Times are changing, and it's catching on that the roles on TV and film need to reflect its diverse viewers.

Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but I think viewers are hungry for shows in which people say something meaningful.

I'm used to politicians being angry with me, you know, because I don't work for them. I work for my viewers.

I saw a story in the Los Angeles Times that 40 percent of the viewers are men. It didn't really surprise me.

Netflix sees people as users or subscribers or customers. Historically, networks have seen people as viewers.

I just think it's so important to have fun because if you're having fun, then your viewers will have fun too.

The viewers have the brains to decide the merits of a film and there is no point in blaming them if it flops.

My hope is to be a trusted utensil for viewers. Like, literally, 'That thing works. I can rely on that thing.'

As the character changes in the movie, it rubs off on the viewer, so the viewer also goes through that change.

Since most of our films cater to crossover audiences, I think it's time we make films for multilingual viewers.

When viewers watch shows, they should relate to the story. There has to be a blend between reality and fiction.

I've always wanted to connect with my viewers but there's only so much you can do through commenting and tweets.

Hollywood is just a bunch of middlemen, people trying to facilitate content transfer between creators and viewers.

Share This Page