If terrorists are already on our southern border, a national-security failure has already occurred.

To leave Afghanistan as a playground for terrorists and adventurers was simply not possible anymore.

A likely source for terrorists seeking to buy or steal nuclear materials is the former Soviet Union.

You cannot make peace with terrorists. The normal dividing lines between war and peace do not apply.

National security is not just things that go boom. It is not just terrorists and foreign adversaries.

That's what really concerns me about the modern-day terrorists that we face is this global expansion.

I am not saying all Muslims are wrong or are terrorists or criminals. You will never hear me say that.

We will make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbour them.

More terrorists and extremists have been captured or killed in Pakistan than in any place in the world.

The jealousy and resentment that animate the terrorists also affect many of our former cold war allies.

Terrorists have failed in what is arguably al Qaida's most important objective - to trigger revolutions.

It is also worth asking whether the strict limitations of Geneva make sense in a war against terrorists.

He can fight terrorists overseas, but he leaves our borders so they can come in here and do their thing.

How can we think we are protected if terrorists can move around freely, if weapons can circulate freely?

Europe is especially vulnerable to terrorists who may hide among the refugees pouring across its borders.

The same European governments that hesitated to confront terrorists were more than prepared to oppose us.

In fact, the place where we have indicted more terrorists or potential terrorists, is our Northern border.

There's no preventative measure between the Palestinians, between those terrorists to the state of Israel.

We are in a war on terrorism. We need to conduct that war and take it to the terrorists, not here at home.

America decided we were going to stand by and let Americans die at the hands of terrorists a long time ago.

There's been intelligence that terrorists would look to programs such as the visa waiver program to exploit.

With awareness and a social movement against extremism, we can prevent our children from becoming terrorists.

The idea of reasoning with terrorists without force or with appeasement is naive, and I think it's dangerous.

There are keyboard terrorists everywhere who hide behind a veil of anonymity to pursue their vicious slanders.

The closer Iraq approaches freedom and democracy, the more impediments and barriers the terrorists will erect.

You can't hold the armed forces responsible for being firm with terrorists. We need to be firm with terrorists.

In the real world, immeasurable hurt is caused by terrorists based in Pakistan who attack countries like India.

When Western politicians propose blanket discrimination against Islam, they bolster the terrorists' propaganda.

Foreign terrorists are using technology to radicalize Americans at a troubling pace that continues to increase.

Every nation in every region now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.

Since 9/11, some of the most violent terrorists we've encountered were radicalized or recruited at universities.

It's not in our interest, nor in the interest of other countries in the region, for terrorists to regroup again.

We all abhor terrorists, but we have to treat them as dangerous to all of us, not to any one particular country.

Democratic states must have access to content exchanged between terrorists on social media and instant messaging.

We must have the right to name our fears and laugh at those who seek to scare us - or risk giving in to terrorists.

I did not want to provide a blueprint or roadmap for the terrorists, saying 'Here are our new security procedures'.

Pakistan and its associates find it difficult to understand that there are no 'good terrorists and bad terrorists.'

With those attacks, the terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States. And war is what they got.

I do believe that we should keep guns out of the hands of terrorists, would-be terrorists, and a lot of other people.

The democratic process is always vulnerable and threatened by terrorists, by parties that do not believe in democracy.

The Islamic State has proven that terrorists can seize and deploy modern military equipment on lesser-armed opponents.

Domestic terrorism has opened new war zones, operating off the assumption that all Americans are potential terrorists.

Certainly, its important to protect the water system and that covers, certainly, everything from vandals to terrorists.

We work incredibly hard with our E.U. and international partners to make the online space a hostile one for terrorists.

We know there are terrorists communicating with individuals in the United States. We just can't see what they're saying.

The terrorists haven't won, and we should tell them in plain English, 'No, there will never be a mosque at Ground Zero.'

The NRA is interested in protecting the civil rights of Americans, not protecting the ability of terrorists to get guns.

Let us follow the facts, not Liberal ideology, and let us target the root cause of terrorism. They are called terrorists.

Cabinet resolutions approving mass releases of terrorists deal a mortal blow to the status of Israel's judges and courts.

Gun bans disarm victims, putting them at the mercy of murderers or terrorists who think nothing of breaking the gun laws.

Share This Page