Quotes of All Topics . Occasions . Authors
Those are the two issues: Protecting the homeland and stopping the war and going after ISIS in a way that ends the terrorism.
Iran is an unapologetic sponsor of global terrorism, and cutting off Iran's ability to finance those activities is necessary.
Asymmetrical warfare is a euphemism for terrorism, just like collateral damage is a euphemism for killing innocent civilians.
Islamic law is clearly against terrorism, against any kind of deliberate killing of civilians or similar 'collateral damage.'
No one pursuing reasonable goals and who is prepared to compromise can argue that terrorism is his or his group's only option.
Here's the thing you got to remember: I don't believe that the breakpoint is terrorism. I believe... the breakpoint is Sharia.
Terrorism is about magnifying one mediagenic act of violence into one hundred billion acts of terrorized authoritarian idiocy.
I don't believe in inevitability. But I think it's pretty close to being inevitable...Yes, I think it's probably a near thing.
Terrorism has essentially become a franchise in the Middle East and North Africa and increasingly in other parts of the world.
Terrorism and the refugee crisis have changed the political mood in the West and brought the extreme right to prominence there.
Every European country faces threats which ignore national frontiers: pandemics, climate change, terrorism and organised crime.
Syria will remain a hotbed of terrorism as long as the civil war, aided and abetted by the Iranians and the Russians, continue.
Only In America can a renowned and devoted terrorism supporter like Peter King be the arbiter of national security and treason.
Whether you call it terrorism or resistance, and whether you like Hamas or not, it is a political entity that no one can ignore.
Russia gave us the mission to destroy terrorism and extinguish it in the North Caucasus, and results have already been achieved.
Can a nation use the methods of terrorism? Can it harm innocent civilians in the process? What are the costs? Where is the line?
The Blue and White government, led by me, will assemble the strongest security cabinet against terrorism and restore deterrence.
We need to keep an eye on influences from the Middle East or, let's say, indigenous groups, that might be involved in terrorism.
[I provoke] the system [to] show its true face ... so that through its own acts of terrorism ... the masses will rise against it.
Leveraging the global finance system against Iran and other rogue nations that sponsor terrorism is a position I'm happy to take.
If you allow thousands or millions of unidentified persons into your house, the risk of... terrorism will significantly increase.
We cannot allow a beachhead of terrorism to form inside America. We cannot allow our nation to become a sanctuary for extremists.
We know that we can defeat Islamist terrorism without violating our ideals; indeed, we must. These ideals, these American ideals.
Terrorism should be seen in the light of the country's security and not from the narrow perspective of caste, creed and religion.
This is not a battle between the United States of America and terrorism, but between the free and democratic world and terrorism.
The fact that a terrorist was killed, and it doesn't matter if it was in Dubai or Gaza, is good news to those fighting terrorism.
The terrorism danger to the United States "is even worse than September 11th, when 19 hijackers murdered almost 3,000 Americans."
The atmosphere is different in Congress after September 11. Terrorism is no longer an abstract issue, but a real, tangible threat.
If America has the right to target Osama bin Laden, or terrorists, of course Israel has the right to defend itself from terrorism.
Now I know a lot about NATO - NATO is obsolete, and the reason it's obsolete is because of the fact they don't focus on terrorism.
We can only move to a long-term resolution regarding terrorism and war by planting seeds of peace. We have to start with ourselves.
Terrorism tramples upon any rights and freedoms and generates fear and hatred; it is an obstacle to efforts at improving our world.
Certainly, the fight against terrorism is a legitimate fight. And certainly whoever commits terrorism should be brought to justice.
The United States happens to be the only state in the world that has been condemned by the World Court for international terrorism.
American farmers, by making the commitment to grow more corn for ethanol, are at the top of the spear on the war against terrorism.
Our country will continue efforts to prevent terrorism in close cooperation with the United States and the international community.
I extend my deepest gratitude to our Armed Forces and first responders serving both at home and abroad in the war against terrorism.
Once, Azamgarh was known in the field of education and literature, but the Samajwadi Party turned it into a stronghold of terrorism.
I don't support terrorism and never have. As a Sri Lankan that fled war and bombings, my music is the voice of the civilian refugee.
I admire President Chavez for his strength to resist the United States. Instead, Bush is waging a war of terrorism against the world.
There are no automatic links between poverty and terrorism. Among millions of poor people in the world, only a few turn to terrorism.
Fighting a war on terrorism is like fighting against crime. We can never hope to eradicate crime, so we shouldn't bother fighting it.
I think it's very important to have a sense of balance in covering the war, but you don't have to be morally neutral about terrorism.
Very often when we talk about war, conflict or terrorism, we talk about it very politically. We forget that there are people involved.
Nuclear power plants must be prepared to withstand everything from earthquakes to tsunamis, from fires to floods to acts of terrorism.
When we have dealt with bin Laden and his network we will then broaden the campaign to go after other terrorists all around the world.
American credibility in the war on terrorism depends on a strong stand against all terrorist acts, whether committed by foe or friend.
Saudi hijackers first came into contact with al-Qaeda and went through Terrorism 101 when they signed up for the jihad in Afghanistan.
While the vast majority of hackers may be disinclined towards violence, it would only take a few to turn cyber terrorism into reality.