Based on observations of the policies of my own government, I viewed this action as an acceptable option.

I research best practices and recipes for success and failure to craft personalised policies for my city.

Stalin's policies pushed the world into the Cold War. Putin has the potential to be equally as dangerous.

Jobs have to be created on the ground, one at a time. This requires detailed plans and specific policies.

Trump's policies are a mix of fairly traditional things. Even his immigration stuff isn't really that new.

It's not a good idea to conceptualize a static relationship with long-standing policies, like health care.

Barack Obama has been the architect of policies that have hurt our country domestically as well as foreign.

Social and economic policies constructed around the male breadwinner model have always disadvantaged women.

For decades, NRDC has created and supported policies that will ultimately end our reliance on fossil fuels.

In China, export lobbies have fought for policies that favor their interests and limit foreign competition.

Government does not create jobs, but it can help set the table for economic growth with the right policies.

It's conservative policies that create the conditions for prosperity, and we'll all benefit thanks to that.

In the area of macroeconomic policies, I think we'll see more centralization, like in the budgetary sphere.

Concrete steps are needed to reduce the role of nuclear weapons in military plans, doctrines, and policies.

I'm no friend of Tony Blair's and I consider the Middle East policies of the United States and the UK fatal.

As a businessman, you need economic certainty. On the tax policies. You need it on your regulatory policies.

It is a fact that governments tend to put in place policies and strategies in response to current scenarios.

When I was younger, I remember families like mine who had to deal with the disastrous policies of the 1970s.

I am often critical of Israel's policies when in the country, but then feel defensive of them when overseas.

A populist is someone who fights for common sense economic policies that sustain and expand the middle class.

The nation can no longer afford to continue policies that hasten the flight of persons to the distant suburbs.

I'm not apologetic with respect to the policies of the Bush administration. I think we basically got it right.

We will as soon as possible reexamine our laws and policies and eliminate all obstacles to genuine investment.

I think there is a difference between connecting with a character and supporting and believing their policies.

So we should all, me included, stop fighting each other and arguing about our differences on certain policies.

I am convinced that policies meant to reduce alleged carbon dioxide-induced global warming will be destructive.

Lincoln Davis has supported Nancy Pelosi's anti-business, big government policies a disturbing 83% of the time.

Mexican immigration poses challenges to our policies and to our identity in a way nothing else has in the past.

In terms of politics, I just look at people's policies, and sometimes I agree with something, sometimes I won't.

Now the truth is, a president really can't control the economy, although his policies do have some effect on it.

People can also change the timing of when they earn and receive their income in response to government policies.

Child care is very important, so I want to put dollars there, and I want to make sure we get the policies right.

In Iran, people are free to express their views. Every day, some people criticize the policies of the government.

We cannot afford four more years of this misguided socialist policies from President Obama and his administration.

Federal policies must understand the linkages between economic growth, social mobility, and a strong middle class.

We need to fashion policies with proper incentives to reduce the amount of carbon we are putting in the atmosphere.

Only in Washington can the pursuit of a conservative agenda, with centrist policies, be depicted as liberal reform.

When I took over in 2000, Odisha was in a terrible financial state due to various policies, some of them unpopular.

We don't need more divisive language or programs and policies that are going to tear the fabric of the nation apart.

I think a strong dollar is the result of policies, but I don't think the strong dollar is in and of itself a policy.

Policies aimed at reversing globalization will lead only to a decrease in real income as goods become more expensive.

I thought I could make change by just working at ground level, but to change a community, you have to change policies.

American farmers and ranchers deserve a USDA that will pursue supportive policies rather than seek their further harm.

What I do know is that liberal Democrat policies in our big cities are not helping anybody, especially our big cities.

The Democratic Party's governing elite has long believed there is no problem that European-style policies cannot cure.

Most of the policies that support robust economic growth in the long run are outside the province of the central bank.

Human and moral factors must always be considered. They must never be missing from policies and from public discussion.

I believe that to further strategic growth and development via design, we need to have a set of public design policies.

Government policies ought to encourage families to stay together and work hard to improve their lives, not punish them.

It is our character that supports the promise of our future - far more than particular government programs or policies.

Share This Page