Quotes of All Topics . Occasions . Authors
Democracy is not about one party dominating.
I only follow one party: the Vietnamese Party.
I'm not beholden to one party or any special interests.
War may be made by one party, but it requires two to make peace.
After one party loses two elections in a row, there's sort of blood in the water.
Eleven years at Vogue and not one party crasher, and it won't happen here either.
Individuals move and shift from one party to another simply on their aspirations for office.
So I'm just waiting until one party or the other actually gets a moral compass and a backbone.
I don't want foreign policy developed just by one party and ride roughshod over the other party.
A quarrel is quickly settled when deserted by one party; there is no battle unless there be two.
There were various things behind my departure from Napoli. The will of just one party is not enough.
You cannot say we are a healthy, dynamic democracy when one party wins almost two-thirds of the vote.
Politics are private. I don't understand people who try to convince you to join one party or another.
The achievements we forge in this place and in our nation will not be those of one person or one party.
What is human warfare but just this; an effort to make the laws of God and nature take sides with one party.
Any coalition, especially where one party is more powerful than the other, it's always bound to have a pecking order.
It's not proper for a professor to go before a class and promote one party or another. That's not academic scholarship.
There is only one party in the United States: the Property party... and it has two right wings: Republican and Democrat.
In Cuba we have one party, but in the U.S. there is very little difference. Both parties are an expression of the ruling class.
The best government is the least government. In some areas, I'm libertarian. I don't subscribe to any one party; they are all bad.
When one party is really unpopular, like the Conservatives in 1997, AV can really skew the result disproportionately against them.
One of the most important principles I've learned is, every so often, just drop everything. Stop racing from one party to the next.
A mark of stupidity is a belief that one party is totally virtuous and correct on the issues while the other is evil and always wrong.
Belonging to one party is acceptable. But my days of just ticking the party box are long over. I judge the candidates for who they are.
Most economic fallacies derive from the tendency to assume that there is a fixed pie, that one party can gain only at the expense of another.
It is unfair to suppose that one party has invariably acted rightly, and that the other is responsible for every wrong that has been committed.
Our nation needs protection against complete dominance of Parliament by one party, which could allow a tiny number of people to control everything.
A judge is supposed to be able to make a decision, and when you make a decision, very often one party - and very often both - are a little disappointed.
And humility in politics means accepting that one party doesn't have all the answers; recognising that working in partnership is progress not treachery.
See, I think if it just became who's sleeping with whom, then there's no reason to prefer one party over the other, 'cause the truth is we're all sinners.
We all know what the problems are: it's tax and spend. One party will tax and spend, the other party won't tax but will spend. It's both of them together.
Remember that a civilized nation cannot just have one party; if there were only one party, this would merely be a dictatorship. Politics could not advance.
There is no real third party in America. There's this one party that has two sides to it - the Democratic and Republican side. It's one party that has two heads.
Syria should not belong to one family, to one coterie, or to one party. It belongs to all the people of Syria equally, in all their religious and ethnic diversity.
I've never been tied to one party or one candidate or even one institution. And that's true even with one church as a Christian. I'm committed to truth and justice.
Our love, our gratitude, our admiration for our men and women in uniform, our veterans and their families - all of that is bigger than any one party or any one election.
One of the clear problems of Obamacare is that it was perceived, I think rightly, as one party forcing its vision of how healthcare should be upon the rest of the country.
Unfortunately, in collective bargaining one party or the other too often tries to gain an advantage - a bargain, like buying something in a store for less than it is worth.
There is one party, the Conservative Party who is committed to honouring the referendum result, getting Brexit done and then delivering on the priorities of the British people.
I made it clear to myself at least 50 times that I am neither associated with any party nor do I have any transaction with any party. I have only one party, which is music party.
While one party may possess the levers of power, one party does not possess a monopoly on good ideas. Good lawmaking, after all, is about the ability to craft effective solutions.
I do think voters are ready for a change in Olympia and after 28 years of one party rule, they are ready to put a new team on the field and bring a new approach to state government.
It is to the advantage of Hispanics not to be taken for granted by one party and ignored by the other. Hispanics will realize their political power only if courted and engaged by both sides.
Boxing is not that complicated. If two guys want to fight, it's not hard to make a fight. If the fight's not made, it's because one party doesn't want that fight, or maybe both parties don't want it.
My dad came out of the Roosevelt era and the Depression. One person and one party made a difference in his life. That's what everybody forgot when they called my father and other people political bosses.
I think for those of us who think that our morality is something that needs to be in touch with our religious faith personally, then it's really important to explain that no one party has a monopoly on faith.
You have one party that's in favor of open borders, and you have one party that wants to secure the border. And all day long, the American people are going to side with the party that wants to secure the border.
In a government such as ours we have vigorous contests to determine who should lead. The recent election was no exception. Now we inaugurate a new government on a day that transcends any one individual or any one party.
For too long, I think the African-American community has been taken for granted by one party and completely ignored by the other. It is not acceptable. It's not good for the parties, for the country, or for the community.
I like the idea of separation of services. ISPs provide a pipe. Other vendors provide security. Other vendors provide email. When one party controls all the services, it's a 'synergy' for the company, but rarely for the consumer.