Law not served by power is an illusion; but power not ruled by law is a menace which our nuclear age cannot afford.

We were able and we had a plan to launch nuclear test in 1984, but then President General Zia had opposed the move.

It is not productive to see things in simple black and white, and talk in either anti-nuclear or pro-nuclear terms.

If the greenhouse effect is a blanket in which we wrap ourselves to keep warm, nuclear winter kicks the blanket off.

The creation of a nuclear weapons convention is not only achievable, it is imperative if civilisation is to survive.

Women don't go to war to kill other women. Wars and armies and nuclear weapons are essentially heterosexual hobbies.

Nuclear war is such an emotional subject that many people see the weapons themselves as the common enemy of humanity.

This is one of the worst deals ever made by any country in history. The deal with Iran will lead to nuclear problems.

All nations that have nuclear weapons think that they are responsible and it is the other guys who are irresponsible.

We have to be extremely vigilant and extremely careful when it comes to nuclear. Nuclear changes the whole ball game.

Nuclear energy is a baseload - meaning it's power that you can run any time you want, day or night - and carbon-free.

To me, nuclear weapons are the secret crisis of our time. Frankly, everyone needs to reread John Hersey's 'Hiroshima.'

If world is suspicious that Israel may detonate nuclear bomb and if the suspicion is a deterrent - that's good enough.

The controls of life are structured as forms and nuclear arrangements, in a relation with the motions of the universe.

I see that the West is beginning to separate the question of nuclear armament from the peaceful use of nuclear energy.

President Obama has made it clear that the United States is determined to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

It is impossible to work out a reduction in nuclear threat as long as one side is going all out to demonize the other.

You have North Korea, you have nuclear weapons, and China could solve that problem. And they're not helping us at all.

In order to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear country you have to introduce a system of verification and inspection.

For nuclear power to have a future, we'll either need more Yucca Mountains or a way to decrease the stuff we put there.

We cannot afford to spend millions and millions over nuclear arms when there is poverty and unemployment all around us.

What could become a danger to world peace is Iran's nuclear program and the country's open threat to annihilate Israel.

Russia has every reason to dispose of its nuclear arsenal... to suit its interests and international legal obligations.

Getting ready for a global pandemic is every bit as important as nuclear deterrence and avoiding a climate catastrophe.

In the 1990s, we were certain that Saddam Hussein had a nuclear arsenal. In fact, his factories could barely make soap.

When George W. Bush came into office, North Korea had maybe one nuclear weapon and verifiably wasn't producing any more.

I told my therapist I was having nightmares about nuclear explosions. He said don't worry it's not the end of the world.

Once Iraq becomes a nuclear power, the very decision to go to war against it would become a totally different ball game.

We have an arsenal of ideas about land use possibly as dangerous to human life on the planet as the use of nuclear arms.

Mick Jagger and I just really liked each other a lot. We talked all night. We had the same views on nuclear disarmament.

The Iranian acquisition of nuclear weapons would be infinitely more costly than any scenario you can imagine to stop it.

So long as nuclear weapons continue to exist, so will the temptation to threaten others with overwhelming military force.

The consequence of a world full of nuclear powers to me is so incomprehensible in terms of the dangers that that implies.

Now I am become death, the destroyer of worlds. (quoting the Bhagavad-Gita after witnessing the first Nuclear explosion.)

The public should always be notified as soon as possible in the event of a leak or other emergency at a nuclear facility.

Nuclear weapons are intrinsically neither moral nor immoral, though they are more prone to immoral use than most weapons.

I will confine myself to reaffirming the Israel will not be the first country to introduce nuclear weapons to the region.

No more turning a blind eye to Chinese spies in our nuclear labs. No more keeping silent about Chinese slave labor camps.

...there is no safe level of exposure to ionizing radiation, and the search for quantifying such a safe level is in vain.

Even with the best intentions, you can have a nuclear war, a nuclear holocaust, through miscalculation, through accidents.

[Saddam Hussein is aggressively seeking nuclear and biological weapons and ] the United States may well become the target.

I believe that nuclear needs to be a part of the solution if the U.S. really wants to be aggressive about reducing carbon.

We still live in a world where if you have nuclear weapons, you are buying power; you are buying insurance against attack.

I hope that none of the countries in the Middle East are planning anything but the peaceful utilization of nuclear energy.

Weapons of mass destruction - nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons - are just that, and no cause can excuse their use.

We should not just consume hydrocarbon fuel but use it to develop nuclear energy, hydro power and renewable energy sources.

Generation after generation can't just be loaded with more and more nuclear weapons and not ultimately dance to that music.

Nuclear tests poison the environment - and they also poison the political climate. They breed mistrust, isolation and fear.

As long as Iran believes that its security will be increased by having a nuclear program, it's going to pursue its program.

I would characterize current US nuclear weapons policy as immoral, illegal, militarily unnecessary, and dreadfully dangerous

Share This Page