Nuclear Quotes - Page 6

Grid View List View
Quote of the DayPicture QuotesTop 100 Inspirational QuotesTop 100 Love QuotesTop 100 Happiness Quotes
Mahatma GandhiThomas JeffersonAldous HuxleyKhalil GibranSteven WrightLucy LarcomRuth Bader GinsburgBarack ObamaJoe BidenGeorge Carlin
RelationshipBeautyCoolBrainyWarNikeKingsPeaceParentingLegal

In the late 1950s a major topic under discussion was whether Canada should acquire nuclear weapons.

Russia and the U.S. have unique experience in ensuring the safety and security of nuclear material.

Nuclear weapons and TV have simply intensified the consequences of our tendencies, upped the stakes.

As far as the nuclear is concerned, I agree. It is the single greatest threat that this country has.

A likely source for terrorists seeking to buy or steal nuclear materials is the former Soviet Union.

I'd be the last one to use the nuclear weapons, because that's sort of like the end of the ballgame.

The lesson of the Cold War is that against nuclear weapons, only nuclear weapons can hold the peace.

U.S. nuclear weapons that are available for presidential use are targeted against broad ocean areas.

It's very important to make nuclear deals but you have to make them from strength, not from weakness.

If the nuclear program is indeed meant only for civil purposes, then it is wrong to impose sanctions.

This means that the only function of nuclear weapons, while they exist, is to deter a nuclear attack.

While nothing is certain, I firmly believe our nation is on the verge of a nuclear energy renaissance.

While nothing is certain, I firmly believe our nation is on the verge of a nuclear energy renaissance.

Hillary Clinton's policies unleashed ISIS, spread terrorism and put Iran on a path to nuclear weapons.

I think that just as we're in the nuclear era we're also in an era of non-violence. It's undefeatable.

India can live without nuclear weapons. That's our dream, and it should be the dream of the U.S. also.

The risk of just one terrorist with just one nuclear weapon is a risk we simply cannot afford to take.

India can live without nuclear weapons. That's our dream, and it should be the dream of the U.S. also.

I think that once the nuclear alternative happens, it's over. At the same time, we have to be prepared.

At present, it's not really clear who is in charge of protecting the nation from solar and nuclear EMP.

There are many people inside Iran who say, "We don't have enough to eat. Why do we need a nuclear bomb?"

Our nation's power plant fleet must include a mix of solar, wind, hydro, natural gas and nuclear plants.

The total elimination of nuclear weapons remains the highest disarmament priority of the United Nations.

The misconception that a victory can be worth its price, has in the nuclear age become a total illusion.

Nixon did have a secret plan, and I knew that it involved making threats of nuclear war to North Vietnam.

Every serious nuclear accident involves operator error, so you want to eliminate the operator altogether.

U.S. nuclear technology is one of this nation's most valuable secrets, and it should have been protected.

Originally I had planned to revert to nuclear physics there, in particular the structure of the deuteron.

All nuclear material in weapons programmes must be subject one day to binding international verification.

The great thing about Glasgow is that if there's a nuclear attack it'll look exactly the same afterwards.

I'm in favor of dealing with Iran and dealing with the nuclear issue, but I'm not in favor of a bad deal.

The larger picture here is that a North Korea with nuclear weapons adds to the larger proliferation risk.

If nuclear warfare is believed to be somewhat controlled, then climate change is now the greatest threat.

If you don't believe ... Saddam Hussein is a threat with nuclear weapons, then you shouldn't vote for me.

We are categorically against any new military nuclear power, be it Iran, be it North Korea, be it anyone.

Except for fools and madmen, everyone knows that nuclear war would he an unprecedented human catastrophe.

They'll be no learning period with nuclear weapons. Make one mistake and you're going to destroy nations.

I've always thought of nuclear as something that's good for the environment. I worry about my polar bears.

I was 11 when I was molested. It was like a nuclear explosion going off in my life, destroying everything.

Some programs have been theatrical masterpieces, but all we're seeing is the negative side of nuclear war.

My dad was a Navy munitions officer, and by the end of his career, he was a specialist in nuclear weapons.

Nuclear arms and atomic power represent a technology in which coexistence with man is extremely difficult.

Look: I don't want to live with a nuclear Iran. I would like to make it uncomfortable for them to seek it.

Nuclear proliferation - the proliferation of WMDs altogether - is one of the greatest dangers of our time.

Nuclear-armed Iran ought to be a major concern. And they're moving forward. We have got to roll that back.

The nexus between terrorism and nuclear weapons, or even nuclear material, is obviously a current concern.

All mankind is now learning that these nuclear weapons can only serve to destroy, never become beneficial.

The spread of nuclear weapons is the greatest threat facing the country-and I would argue facing humanity.

The Russians and the Chinese have been absolutely clear they don't want to see Iran with a nuclear weapon.

We have a safe and good command-and-control system. Nobody can take away any nuclear weapon from Pakistan.

Share This Page