Quotes of All Topics . Occasions . Authors
Marxism is the opium of the Marxists.
Some call it Marxism — I call it Judaism.
Marxism is the opium of the intellectuals.
Marxism is the modern form of Jewish prophecy.
It is capitalism, not Marxism, that trades in futures.
Marxism is essentially a product of the bourgeois mind.
Sea Shepherd is to terrorism what Groucho was to Marxism.
Marxism is always open, always critical, always self-critical.
An excessive knowledge of Marxism is a sign of a misspent youth.
If people don't like Marxism, they should blame the British Museum.
Marxism is not scientific: at the best, it has scientific prejudices.
The world would not be in such a snarl, had Marx been Groucho instead of Karl.
Marxism is a revolutionary worldview that must always struggle for new revelations.
Marxism has not only failed to promote human freedom, it has failed to produce food.
The important part of Marxism was its demand for active, constant, practical, class-war.
I was a commie and I fought about Marxism and class and race and it informed everything I did.
Despite its flaws, Marxism still seems to explain the material world better than anything else.
When we truly discover love, capitalism will not be possible and Marxism will not be necessary.
As the class struggle sharpens in the U.S. Marxism will come into its own as a great popular study.
Marxism is what has seduced American liberals - well, liberals worldwide, communists, all leftists.
Global warming, like Marxism, is a political theory of actions, demanding compliance with its rules.
There is not Communism or Marxism, but representative democracy and social justice in a well-planned economy.
At the same time, of course, Marxism arose - Rosa Luxembourg, Leninism, anarchism - and art became political.
There's something about Marxism that brings out warts; the only kind of growth this economic system encourages.
Marxism is like a classical building that followed the Renaissance; beautiful in its way, but incapable of growth.
For some years I deserted religion in favour of Marxism. The republic of goodness seemed more attainable than the Kingdom of God.
Marxism is the only doctrine that both satisfies the demands for progress and provides a safe outlet for moral expression in a skeptical age.
My parents believed in the ideology of the Left. And being influenced by Marxism and Leninism theories, they chose Marlena as my second name.
Marxism requires that we destroy God, because government must become God. And the only way for government to become God is to destroy the concept of God.
Marxism conceives of the new system of socialism as the necessary outcome of all previous history made possible and necessary only by that previous history.
Because of my Marxism, I was not into myths or miracles, whether it was the virgin birth, the physical resurrection or casting out demons from an epileptic.
What guides Marxism, then, is a different model of society, and a different conception of the function of the knowledge that can be produced by society and acquired from it.
Every age has found some alternative to American values appealing. The number of Western intellectuals enamored of fascism and all the various expressions of Marxism was legion.
Darwin himself, in his day, was unable to fight free of the theoretical errors of which he was guilty. It was the classics of Marxism that revealed those errors and pointed them out.
I would say I was still a Marxist - which is not to be confused with being a Communist. Despite its flaws, Marxism still seems to explain the material world better than anything else.
I would say that all traditional philosophies up to and including Marxism have tried to derive the 'ought' from the 'is.' My point of view is that this is impossible; this is a farce.
During the Reagan Administration, so much attention was devoted to fighting Marxism in Nicaragua and El Salvador that Washington lost sight of longer-term challenges in other countries.
Vietnam should have taught us that nationalism, with its engines of independence and self-determination, is a more powerful force by far than Marxism and must be understood and respected.
Traditional Marxism attempted to argue against free enterprise by saying that capitalism causes poverty and that, therefore, socialism is necessary. That didn't work, because it was false.
Marxism is a success because it fuses the two inconsistent strains in Western thought - moral skepticism and moral indignation - and makes them complements in the attack against existing society.
The relevance of Marxism to science is that it removes it from its imagined position of complete detachment and shows it as a part, but a critically important part, of economy and social development.
For us, Marxism is always open because there are always new xperiences, there are always new facts, including facts about the past, which have to be incorporated in the corpus of scientific socialism.
Very curious, at the age of about 13 years, Oswald began to study Marxism and he kept on in his writing, affirming that he was a Marxist. Probably he did want to show himself as a great, supreme Marxist.
There are a few people, but a diminishing number, who still believe that Marxism, as an economic system, off era a coherent alternative to capitalism, and socialism has, indeed, triumphed in one country.
Marxism is an interpretation of history which explains the progress of society as a product of the expansion of the forces of production of the material means of life, that is, the development of economy.
Our judgment and moral categories, our idea of the future, our opinions about the present or about justice, peace, or war, everything, without excluding our rejections of Marxism, is impregnated with Marxism.
I was born in 1948, so I'm a '60s kid, and in the '60s everyone talked all the time, endlessly, about socialism versus capitalism, about political choices, ideology, Marxism, revolution, 'the system' and so on.
For the oppressed peoples and classes, for the peoples and workers who have taken control of their destiny, Marxism is a shining path, a sun of hope and certainty that never sets, a sun that is always at its zenith.
In the Cold War, a lot of Soviet actions could be explained as extensions of Czarist imperial ambitions, but that didn't stop us from studying Marxism in theory and Communism in practice to better understand that adversary.
Of course, Marxism is an example of what Carl Popper would have called a 'World Three' structure, in that it's got immense power as an idea, but you couldn't actually hold up anything in the world and say: 'this is Marxism'.