Quotes of All Topics . Occasions . Authors
The encryption genie is out of the bottle.
I'm a strong believer in strong encryption.
Everyone is a proponent of strong encryption.
Encryption would help prevent a lot of cyber attacks.
We have to solve the encryption problem. It is not easy.
There is an unarguable downside to unbreakable encryption.
Encryption threatens to lead all of us to a very dark place.
The problem of end-to-end encryption isn't just a terrorism issue.
Somebody will be able to overcome any encryption technique you use!
I think anybody who uses email in the center of our life needs encryption.
User-controlled default encryption is a real challenge for law enforcement.
Trying to explain Turing's work in encryption and decryption? It's complicated.
Without strong encryption, you will be spied on systematically by lots of people.
The US government still has no idea what documents I have because encryption works
Privacy and encryption work, but it's too easy to make a mistake that exposes you.
It's very hard to keep an uncrackable encryption if you share it with the government.
Properly implemented strong crypto systems are one of the few things that you can rely on.
In some ways, you can think of end-to-end encryption as honoring what the past looked like.
The political solutions proposed against encryption are not going to work against terrorism.
I don't need to understand how encryption works to understand how it's helping the criminals.
You know the interesting thing about encryption is that it cannot be secure just for some people.
We should be careful not to vilify encryption itself, which is essential for privacy, data security, and global commerce.
While encryption protects against cyberattacks, deploying it in warrant-proof form jeopardizes public safety more generally.
The arc of technology is in the direction of unbreakable encryption, and no laws are going to get in the way of that reality.
There are two types of encryption: one that will prevent your sister from reading your diary and one that will prevent your government.
We think the government should be pushing for more encryption. That it's a great thing. You know, it's like the sun and the air and the water.
I don't own encryption, Apple doesn't own encryption. Encryption, as you know, is everywhere. In fact some of encryption is funded by our government.
The stakes in the encryption debate are high, with significant consequences for personal privacy, the U.S. private sector, and our national security.
Attempts to restrict encryption at the state or local levels would only serve to undermine security and economic competitiveness for the entire nation.
I am not convinced that lack of encryption is the primary problem. The problem with the Internet is that it is meant for communications among non-friends.
WhatsApp has a consistent history - from zero encryption at its inception to a succession of security issues strangely suitable for surveillance purposes.
I love strong encryption. It protects us in so many ways from bad people. But it takes us to a place - absolute privacy - that we have not been to before.
It seems that 'national security' is the root password to the Constitution. As with any dishonest superuser, the best countermeasure is strong encryption.
With the growing availability of commoditized encryption, it is becoming easier for common criminals to communicate beyond the reach of traditional surveillance.
We believe that when technology providers deploy encryption in their products, services, and platforms they need to maintain an appropriate mechanism for lawful access.
You don't need to be a spook to care about encryption. If you travel with your computer or keep it in a place where other people can put their hands on it, you're vulnerable.
All too often, vital electronic evidence has been made unavailable through encryption that doesn't allow for execution of legal process including court-approved search warrants.
[Bill] Binney designed ThinThread, an NSA program that used encryption to try to make mass surveillance less objectionable. It would still have been unlawful and unconstitutional.
I'm 16 now, I was 15 when it happened... and the encryption code wasn't in fact written by me, but written by the German member. There seems to be a bit of confusion about that part.
Weaken American encryption and consumers - both good and bad actors - will simply seek their technology from companies based abroad. Weaker encryption also means weaker national security.
Using encryption on the Internet is the equivalent of arranging an armored car to deliver credit card information from someone living in a cardboard box to someone living on a park bench.
If you are going to store your e-wallet on your own server, don't keep your e-wallet on your desktop, and make sure you use encryption. If you lose your computer, your bitcoins are lost forever.
One of the things that I think is true is that encryption actually is able to secure our communications, that every individual can use encryption, and that it's accessible and in many cases free.
Under the cover of encryption, terror masterminds provide recruits with the tactics and tools necessary to carry out attacks using small arms and explosives. None of this requires any overseas travel.
Encryption works. Properly implemented strong crypto systems are one of the few things that you can rely on. Unfortunately, endpoint security is so terrifically weak that NSA can frequently find ways around it.
The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the authority to regulate interstate commerce, and the ENCRYPT Act sends a clear message that the complicated issues with encryption must be addressed thoughtfully and nationally.
What encryption lets us do is say, "Yes, the Internet is insecure." Bad guys are able to compromise computers everywhere, but we're able to tolerate that because if they do intercept our messages, they can't do any harm with it.
I trust and use RakEM for my private messages and calls. Other messengers collected metadata about who I messaged, when and where - RakEM does not collect metadata, encrypts local files, and uses the strongest end-to-end encryption around.
The concern is over what will happen as strong encryption becomes commonplace with all digital communications and stored data. Right now the use of encryption isn't all that widespread, but that state of affairs is expected to change rapidly.