Quotes of All Topics . Occasions . Authors
I love that smell of the emissions!
CO₂ emissions anywhere threaten civilisation everywhere.
Poor people can't cut their emissions - they don't make them.
I am concerned in general about carbon emissions and machine learning.
Through our CO2 emissions, we are making the earth a more fertile world.
Well, I'm not saying that an emissions tax is ever going to be good policy.
Our pollution out of carbon emissions is still very, very low compared to the world.
Ultimately, refiners, like all of us, are going to have to clean up their emissions.
Clearly the climate is changing, whether caused by CO2 emissions or some other cause.
I support the need for Canada to play a significant role in reducing global emissions.
Climate action in cities is the key that unlocks a low emissions and resilient future.
Most emissions aren't caused by individuals, they're caused by corporations and states.
Renewable energy could reduce emissions but also create jobs and improve public health.
We all know that cattle and beef are among the biggest contributors to carbon emissions.
We recognize that greenhouse gas emissions are one of the factors affecting climate change.
It is simply economically impossible to require controls that even approach zero emissions.
I'm committed to the goal of Senate Bill 324, and that is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
I voted against H.R. 1119, which would weaken emissions standards for coal refuse power plants.
Electric cars are coal-powered cars. Their carbon emissions can be worse than gasoline-powered cars.
The growing evidence of climate change is forcing attention on carbon emissions and their reduction.
Carbon zero simply means that the emissions you are releasing either are zero or balance out to zero.
A cap on carbon is important because it sets a specific goal for reducing carbon emissions 80% by 2050.
With the Green New Deal, Seoul is taking big steps to transition to a net-zero emissions economy in 2050.
The automotive X Prize, to a great degree, is focused on addressing petroleum usage and carbon emissions.
We happen to believe that emissions going into the atmosphere are not good for us as humans or Mother Earth.
Denmark, the Netherlands and Germany have detailed plans to cut their greenhouse emissions by 20 to 50 percent.
We are totally schizophrenic. We are trying to reduce emissions, and we subsidize the consumption of fossil fuels.
The United States did not sign Kyoto, yet its emissions are not that different from the countries that did sign it.
There is a majority of scientists that say that global carbon emissions by humans causes some changes in the climate.
I believe those that produce the least emissions in autos will also be those who have the greatest success worldwide.
Our position is that we believe that Canada has to have a comprehensive plan to significantly reduce global emissions.
I'm not disputing that increasing CO2 emissions in the atmosphere is going to have an impact. It'll have a warming impact.
We clearly have to reduce harmful energy emissions. Everyone acknowledges we simply can't switch off fossil fuels overnight.
I'm encouraged by what I'm seeing happening with more and more CEOs stepping up, saying, 'I have to fight carbon emissions.'
Nuclear power can continue to help us reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, but we must do everything we can to make it safer.
I think we can lower our emissions. I think the world will be better off if we did that, and we can do it without cap and trade.
Seoul will strictly limit the total greenhouse gas emissions from buildings and expand the construction of zero-energy buildings.
Let's make sure that when companies make investments to reduce emissions that they're rewarded for that and encouraged to do more.
We need to reduce carbon emissions, protect Maine's key industries and preserve our coastlines from flooding and rising sea levels.
Nowhere are emissions monitored constantly. So the truth is that the real quantity of dioxin emissions from incineration remains unknown.
Climate neutrality means a situation where the world can naturally absorb the emissions that will continue to be produced in our societies.
Reducing and removing greenhouse gas emissions spares our planet from the well-documented degradation that we are witnessing on a global basis.
Climate change threatens the wellbeing of every person around the world and can only be addressed through a global response to reduce emissions.
If the goal is to lower emissions, that's disconnected to most people. If the goal is to save taxpayers' money, now the public has some interest.
We need more food, more forests, better livelihoods for smallholder farmers, and lower emissions. If we want any of them, we must have all of them.
Cows and other livestock account for roughly one-sixth of all greenhouse-gas emissions, and as a general point, eating meat means taxing the Earth.
The world needs to slash emissions by tens of billions of tons annually, which categorically requires government investment and government regulations.
We must reduce the emissions 100 percent. In Venezuela, the emissions are currently insignificant compared to the emissions of the developed countries.
As expanding economies continue to grow, the one source of energy that we can develop rapidly, cheaply and with next-to-no emissions is nuclear energy.
Governments have to conclude a fair, universal, and binding climate agreement, by which every country commits to reducing emissions of greenhouse gases.