Quotes of All Topics . Occasions . Authors
Everyone has a story.
I make movies I want to see.
We humans are a fairly barbarous bunch.
Unrequited love is always a great thing.
In a relationship you have to open yourself up.
I didn't choose BYU, I like to think it chose me.
I have a healthy view of what one can do with art.
I was always looking for the most dramatic emphasis.
I see bits and pieces of me in all the characters in my films.
And with Aaron, I'd have to find a reason not to work with him.
And I've got some screenplays and plays ready to dip into when I need to.
Everybody has the ability to be manipulative, to be hateful and deceitful.
Movies are - all I've found is that they're just tougher and tougher to make.
The future is now. It's time to grow up and be strong. Tomorrow may well be too late.
I wanted to tell a story that interested me as much in the telling as in the watching.
My best male friend is my best friend until he crosses me. We're all protective of the self.
I would be more frightened as a writer if people thought my movies were like science fiction.
People have perhaps gotten to the point where for the most part movies are a just bit of escape.
Without In The Company of Men, I could still be teaching, so who knows if this would've existed.
If we put the camera on ourselves, our friends and neighbors, we'll come up with some scary stuff.
Everyone has a little bit of Howard and Chad in them. I think there's Christine in all men as well.
Relationships in general make people a bit nervous. It's about trust. Do I trust you enough to go there?
I'm more than open to hope, but I think men and women have a difficult time dealing with each other and often take the low road.
We live in a disposable society. It's easier to throw things out than to fix them. We even give it a name - we call it recycling.
People think my work is therapeutic. I don't see it that way. It's not like I'm saving money from a weekly therapy visit by writing down my life.
I think the more the actor lets you know what he thinks of the character, the less the audience cares - like a comedian who laughs at his own jokes.
First I would probably place men at the bottom of the food chain. On a grander scale, I would say they're reacting to change. Feminism has got to be part of that.
My business is can I create a world that's possible and could happen? I think that's the only thing that I have to do, and I think that I have done that each time.
I think Christine and Chad are on the opposite extremes of the spectrum. Christine is a model victim, and Chad is a model perpetrator, and Howard is closer to the middle.
I wanted to make these people real, not like they were in a painting. Like these are people who don't know they're in a period movie. Those concerns are incredibly immediate.
With In the Company of Men, the misogynist label stuck early and firmly. In the end, it probably did hurt the film a bit, because getting women into the theaters was difficult.
I was very careful to cast guys who were very good-looking and very fit and who had a certain sense of privilege about them, because with that sense of privilege comes contempt.
You start as an audience member and create a world you're interested in, and then you move into the telling of those stories, bringing what has interested you as an audience member.
But for me, it feels like a natural extension of what I've been doing: exploring relationships. Here you have two relationships and we can explore how difficult it is for people to be together.
There is a lot of absurdity sometimes, not just in Mormonism but often in other religions that want to pretend that no bad happens in their church, rather than taking care of what bad does happen.
Just in the past few years - since I've been making movies, which isn't a very long time - you now have a culture that is fascinated and informed about the box office in a way that sometimes filmmakers weren't even.
I felt, if I'm going to take on some of the most overdone material, which is men and women and affairs and betrayal of friends, I had better have a new take on it. I think my films come from a desperation not to be boring.
Sitting in an automobile was where I first remember understanding how drama works ... Hidden in the back seat of a sedan, I quickly realized how deep the chasm or intense the claustrophobia could be inside your average family car.
It's funny how that comes up, because sometimes I'll write something and I'll think, I don't know if that's a film or a play, and then other things I feel very strongly about them just being plays - they feel very theatrical to me.
But even with a character like Cary who is relatively outlandish, at the end of the movie he's in a place where I wouldn't have expected him to be - taking on the responsibility of a woman who is pregnant and who used to be his best friend's wife.
I will say that the idea of a woman being deceptive came from that original discussion with critics and reporters about if woman could do that kind of thing. Evelyn, herself, grew out of the discussions about how capable women are of deceit and lying and manipulation.
I was always looking for the most dramatic emphasis. One example would be the letter writing, or the reading of the letters. If you remember from the book, they find the letters and then in the most undramatic way they take them downstairs, they get approval, they sit at a table during the day with their own author, across from each other.
There were certain things that I watched, and I screened a series of period films as well, not because I wanted to copy those, because I wanted to be different. “Far from the Madding Crowd” was one I looked to because I thought it looked so good. “Doctor Zhivago.” Unrequited love is always a great thing. “Tess” was something I looked at, I thought Polanski got the period right.