I take on daunting tasks.

My son is a blessing in every way.

Human suffering is not a competitive sport.

My two careers have been very service-oriented.

I think, of course, all senate races are national races.

I'm no fan of what I've seen health insurance companies do.

I'm not a millionaire, a billionaire, a CEO, or a movie star.

You know what they want in the Central Valley? They want water.

The genetics of autism are real, but there are also environmental triggers.

I know how to take good ideas and turn them into sensible law at great odds.

I believe both parties are sending the wrong kind of people to Washington, D.C.

I believe reduced spending, lower taxation, and economic growth go hand-in-hand.

Feinstein doesn't interact with the people at all, and I think it breeds cynicism.

My son has autism, and I founded the government relations department at Autism Speaks.

If we foster business growth and create opportunities, then our economy will again thrive.

What has Dianne Feinstein done... I'll put my legislative background up against hers any day.

I don't care what the political establishment says, Republican, Democrat - I'm a problem solver.

Anyone that tells you what does or what doesn't cause autism is simply not basing that on facts.

I think we need to have more women in the Republican Party talking about what it is we're trying to do for families.

I think we need a vibrant guest worker program. If we have one, we're going to stop having a lot of issues at the border.

The way our federal agencies are funded, the way the authorizing of these programs are done, I think needs to be completely revamped.

We have bloated, out-of-control, and unresponsive government agencies that need to be reined in and focused by Congress to deliver results.

What makes autism different is the history of neglect into the disorder. It's remained such a mystery that science has been very slow to address it.

We all know Sen. Feinstein is out of touch, but just to make it worse, by not embracing today's technology, she isn't even connected. Out of touch and disconnected.

What's more difficult than knowing there's an effective treatment for your children, but you can't afford to offer it to them because it's not covered by insurance?

Ironically, if you look at Dianne Feinstein's profile and you look at my profile, I'm the 99 percent. Dianne Feinstein's the one percent. She appeals to one percent.

In California, we've had a series of millionaires and billionaires and CEOs and movie stars. We need to take a hard look at how we define legitimate and credible candidates.

When you look at a Congress that has an 84 percent disapproval rating, that means that for the most part, the people of this country, and certainly California, are looking for new leadership.

The federal government secures the border; Californians decide how we want to treat our population. I think we need a vibrant guest worker program. If we have one, we're going to stop having a lot of issues at the border.

I appeal to everyone who understands what it is to have kids in school, have a mortgage, to work for a living; to have someone in their family or in their life who is less-abled and who is going to need help from the government.

In California, for so long now, our families have been struggling in this economic environment, and Dianne Feinstein, been in office nearly half a century, is out of touch of what women and families are going through in California.

Part of the problem you have is that you don't have a dialogue between elected officials and their constituents. They've built these barricades, these barriers around themselves and tried to avoid interaction with their constituents.

The position of Autism Speaks has been for quite awhile that we need to find out what's happening. We know there's a genetic component, and there's an environmental trigger, and until we get to the bottom of what's happening, no one knows what causes autism.

I offer something very different from the lifelong career politicians who have worked their way up to run for higher office or those who can parachute in with checks for $5 million or $10 million, and that seems to be the definition of credible or legitimate. I'm rejecting that premise.

Share This Page