Quotes of All Topics . Occasions . Authors
The Iraqi elections were an important first step.
The radical elements in Islam are very dangerous.
We must find out where the roots of terrorism lie.
Democracy doesn't just consist of holding elections.
It is beyond dispute that Saddam Hussein is a menace.
I think above all, what we need with Iran is patience.
A colossal event is upon us, the birth of a New World Order.
Information technology has politicized the world's population.
We can't make China a friend, but we can behave to make them an enemy.
The art of diplomacy is to take an opportunity and turn it into something.
It's not for nothing that the Iranians are known as rug merchants. They are.
Progress is only possible if the United States and its allies work together.
Yes, Israel's our ally. But, are the Palestinians our enemy? No, they are not.
I don't think the Chinese look out at the world and want to overturn the system.
Simply killing everyone who is already a terrorist today won't solve the problem.
Saddam is a familiar dictatorial aggressor, with traditional goals for his aggression.
Who is the guarantor, if there is one, of a more stable world? It's the United States.
The Iraqis need help establishing a government. We have to provide them with security.
The Russians are not going to do what we want them to do because we want them to do it.
An idea can be as flawless as can be, but its execution will always be full of mistakes.
Russia right now is searching for its soul. It's trying to figure out what it really is.
I'm afraid that the United States is more isolated today than at any other time in my memory.
So far the changes in the president in his second term have been mainly of a rhetorical nature.
After all, we didn't bring democracy to Germany in 1945; Hitler destroyed democracy there first.
If Iraq were to descend into chaos, the Europeans would feel the effects just as much as we would.
The Europeans must finally understand the incredible shock triggered by the attacks of September 11.
I think there's nothing more dangerous than mislearning lessons of history, and we do it perpetually.
The UN could help the Iraqi government get on its feet and help the United States withdraw a bit more.
America wants to work with friends, with allies, with people of good will, to make this a better world.
But there is scant evidence to tie Saddam to terrorist organizations, and even less to the Sept. 11 attacks.
Perhaps the most troubling area in the world goes from the Balkans through the Middle East and in Central Asia.
I think America has to do more than be a broker now. Because both the Palestinians are weak and Israel is very weak.
We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order coming out of the collapse of the US-Soviet antagonisms.
The radical elements in Islam are very dangerous. They want to achieve a return to the Islamic purity of the Middle Ages.
America has never seen itself as a national state like all others, but rather as an experiment in human freedom and democracy.
America is stronger than any state probably since the Roman Empire. But we can't do what used to be done with that kind of strength.
You know, different people are going to react different ways. And I don't think we should be intolerable because people do things a little differently.
Osama bin Laden is going after us to get us out of the region, so he can deal with the regimes that he sees in the region, or replace them with purists.
Many Sunnis, who are still stuck in the Saddam era mindset and believe Iraq belongs to them, are trying to prevent a new country from developing at all.
Saddam's ouster will not necessarily lead to the same result, since Iraq lacks democratic traditions. Democracy doesn't just consist of holding elections.
First of all, I think the Saudis are deeply concerned about the collapse of negotiations between the Israelis and the Palestinians and the resumption of conflict.
Europeans are familiar with terrorism and violence. We have not experienced a true conflict on our soil in a hundred years, and especially not one that involved 3,000 dead.
But the central point is that any campaign against Iraq, whatever the strategy, cost and risks, is certain to divert us for some indefinite period from our war on terrorism.
But, if you believe we should go around the world overturning regimes to make little United States, I don't agree with that, because I don't think we're capable of doing that.
My point was that removing Saddam should not have been our highest priority. Fighting terrorism should have been our number one concern, followed by the Palestinian peace process.
I think that America is a part of the world, that we want to cooperate with the world. We are not the dominant power in the world, that everyone falls in behind us. But we want to reach out and cooperate.
To sum up, the position we took was that since we didn't know the internal situation in Iraq nor Saddam Hussein, that our best bet was to take counsel from the people who did know him and who did deal with him.
Since the days of Peter the Great, Russians have been maybe Europeans who didn't share in the enlightenment and the reformation, or are they Mongol Asians with the European veneer. And they've gone back and forth.
Much of what we know about mathematics and trade comes from the Arabs. Then came stagnation, and now they're the West's whipping boy. This is a problem that cannot be solved overnight, and certainly not militarily.
Everybody is within reach of a television set. And so they're all politicized, and they're all stimulated, and then they have these desires, pleasures, hates, resentments, and so on, and they're reacting instantaneously.